Skip to Main Content

Patent Litigation

View as PDF
Overview

Our Clients

Katten's Patent Litigation team represents both plaintiffs and defendants in patent infringement actions filed in federal jurisdictions throughout the United States and before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the US International Trade Commission (ITC). Our clients come from a variety of industries, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, life sciences, electronics, software, e-commerce and telecommunications.

Our Services

Our attorneys have litigated virtually every type of patent infringement case. Significant parts of our practice involve pharmaceutical patents—we have litigated more than 100 pharmaceutical cases—and electronics/hardware/software/mechanical patents—we have litigated more than 70 such cases.

We have substantial experience representing our clients in multi-defendant cases, including those filed by non-practicing entities. As a result, we know many successful strategies for defending those cases at minimal cost with excellent results. Our litigators routinely defend patent infringement actions in the jurisdictions that are the most popular with patent holding companies, including the Eastern and Northern Districts of Texas, the District of Delaware, the Eastern District of Virginia, the Northern District of Illinois, and the Northern, Central and Southern Districts of California. Our team's track record in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is exceptional. For example, in recent years we have secured four decisions from the Federal Circuit invalidating patents asserted against our clients; three of those were pharmaceutical patent cases.

When necessary, we participate in filing international patent infringement actions to protect our clients' businesses in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions. We have also initiated inter partes and ex parte reexaminations and inter partes review of issued US patents in the USPTO and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In addition, we work to minimize the disruptive effects of patent litigation by developing preemptive solutions such as assessing patent claims and helping clients to design around patents.

Our Patent Litigation team is committed to achieving the best results possible in contested matters, whether through litigation, mediation, arbitration or settlement.

Experience
Pharmaceutical
  • Representation of a global pharmaceutical company in a challenge against a patent covering a drug used to treat high cholesterol in the US District Court for the District of Delaware.
  • Representation of a global pharmaceutical company in a challenge against a patent covering an allergy medication for the eye in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
  • Representation of a global pharmaceutical company in a patent infringement action involving a pharmaceutical treatment for glaucoma.
  • Representation of a global pharmaceutical company in both the US District Court for the District of New Jersey and the Federal Circuit in a successful challenge against the patent covering the use of ofloxacin for ear infections.
  • Representation of a global pharmaceutical company in both the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the Federal Circuit in a successful challenge against the patent covering a drug used to treat high blood pressure and angina.
  • Representation of a multinational pharmaceutical company in an action concerning a proton pump inhibitor in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey.
  • Representation of an international pharmaceutical company in a patent infringement action against a competitor involving a pharmaceutical in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
  • Representation of an international pharmaceutical company in a patent infringement action involving a drug to treat high blood pressure in the US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.
Software, Electronics and Technology
  • Assistance to a multinational consumer electronics company in a lawsuit relating to predictive text software.
  • Representation of a bank and financial services company in a successful PTAB post-grant review defense (and subsequent appeal) regarding covered business methods.
  • Representation of a developer of vascular medical products in a patent infringement action regarding stents.
  • Representation of a fashion retailer in a multidefendant case involving more than 100 defendants after a favorable claim construction ruling. Achieved dismissal of case against client.
  • Representation of a fashion retailer in a patent infringement case involving credit card reading system.
  • Representation of a group of chemical manufacturing companies in a patent infringement action against competitor chemical company.
  • Representation of a leader in document technology and services in a patent infringement action relating to software.
  • Representation of a leader in document technology and services in a patent infringement action relating to software.
  • Representation of a market leader in service provider class wireless broadband in a patent infringement action relating to wireless spread spectrum communications systems.
  • Representation of a multinational conglomerate corporation in a patent challenge against a patent covering digital X-ray technology in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
  • Representation of a multinational conglomerate corporation in both the US District Court for the District of Utah and the Federal Circuit in a successful defense of claims of patent infringement under a patent covering a capacitor motor.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company as a third-party defendant in a lawsuit relating to wireless telephony.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company as defendant in patent litigation relating to digital audio recorders.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in a lawsuit relating to flip phones with dual displays.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in a patent infringement action involving navigation systems.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in lawsuit relating to smartcards in cell phones.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in litigation relating to antenna features.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in litigation relating to cellular technology.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in litigation relating to mobile phone technology.
  • Representation of a multinational consumer electronics company in litigation relating to various features used in cell phones.
  • Representation of a pet supply company in a patent infringement case. The Federal Circuit reversed ITC's decision that the asserted patent claim was valid, resulting in a win for our client.
  • Representation of a provider of interactive solutions for education, business and government in a patent infringement relating to interactive classroom learning technology.
  • Representation of a textile/clothing corporation in a patent infringement action involving method for molding and curing silicone. The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas stayed the case pending arbitration.
  • Representation of a transportation and logistics services provider in a patent infringement action.
  • Representation of a world leader in shape-adaptive structures in a patent infringement action and ITC action involving chemical process.
  • Representation of an innovator of pet supply products in a patent infringement for an automated self-cleaning litter box.
  • Successful representation of a multinational electronics manufacturer in defense of a patent infringement lawsuit and in inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB.
Advisories
Newsletters
Spring 2015
Events
September 30, 2015
Paragraph IV Disputes | Chicago, Illinois
April 27–28, 2015
January 23–24, 2014
July 23–24, 2012

Recognition

Litigation – Patent (Los Angeles), 2014–2016
Litigation – Intellectual Property (Chicago), 2012–2017
Litigation – Patent (National), 2012–2017
Intellectual Property (Illinois), 2006–2017
Litigation – Patent (Chicago), 2012–2017

Managing Intellectual Property IP Handbook

"Highly Recommended" firm for intellectual property in Illinois, 2013–2014
Patent Law (Chicago), 2016

IAM Patent 1000

Patent Litigation, 2017
Litigation – Intellectual Property (National), 2012–2017
Previous Next

Recognition

Litigation – Patent (Los Angeles), 2014–2016
Litigation – Intellectual Property (Chicago), 2012–2017
Litigation – Patent (National), 2012–2017
Intellectual Property (Illinois), 2006–2017
Litigation – Patent (Chicago), 2012–2017

Managing Intellectual Property IP Handbook

"Highly Recommended" firm for intellectual property in Illinois, 2013–2014
Patent Law (Chicago), 2016

IAM Patent 1000

Patent Litigation, 2017
Litigation – Intellectual Property (National), 2012–2017

OUR CLIENTS SAY...

"They are extremely responsive, creative thinkers and they are very cost-aware."

Chambers USA 2016
(Intellectual Property)

Katten Websites   Careers  |  Alumni  |  Mobile Site
Contact Us   Offices  |  Media Center  |  People  |  Email
Legal Notices   Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy  |  United Kingdom Notices  |  Attorney Advertising