Skip to Main Content

Indefiniteness Guidance in Advance of Nautilus Decision

Published in Law360
Article | May 8, 2014

This article discusses the Federal Circuit's recent opinion in In re Thomas G. Packard, in conjunction with the US Supreme Court's criticism of the “insolubly ambiguous” standard for indefiniteness during oral arguments in Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc., and how it likely indicates a change in the way indefiniteness of patent claims will be resolved during litigation.

Katten Websites   Careers  |  Alumni  |  Mobile Site
Contact Us   Offices  |  Media Center  |  People  |  Email
Legal Notices   Disclaimer  |  Privacy Notice  |  Cookie Notice  |  United Kingdom Notices  | Accessibility 
Attorney Advertisting. © 2019 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP