Skip to Main Content

Partner Samson Helfgott Quoted in ABA Journal on Bilski Ruling

Firm News | August 2010

Samson Helfgott, a partner in the firm’s Intellectual Property Practice, was quoted in an article in the ABA Journal on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski vs. Kappos, which declined to impose sweeping new restrictions on the types of inventions that can be patented, instead reaffirming its traditional approach to patent eligibility. The Court’s majority opinion says that “petitioners’ claims are not patentable processes because they are attempts to patent abstract ideas.”

Mr. Helfgott joins a number of experts in criticism of the ruling and the confusion it is bound to create. “The decision was disappointing because there was not even a hint of a guideline for what is an abstract idea and what isn’t. It will mean more money for patent litigators. I’m looking forward to a whole host of new arguments over what is and isn’t an abstract idea,” he says. ("Standing By Its Flexible Standards," August 2010)

Katten Websites   Careers  |  Alumni  |  Mobile Site
Contact Us   Offices  |  Media Center  |  People  |  Email
Legal Notices   Disclaimer  |  Privacy Notice  |  Cookie Notice  |  United Kingdom Notices  | Accessibility 
Attorney Advertisting. © 2019 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP