|
|
Trusts and Estates
Our attorneys provide the full panoply of trusts and estates related services on a local, national and international level. We perform sophisticated estate, tax, business, charitable and personal planning for high net worth individuals, entrepreneurs and others with complex assets or affairs. We represent both fiduciaries and beneficiaries in connection with ongoing estate and trust administration on a multigenerational basis. We are also experienced in handling contested proceedings involving estates and trusts in the courts, before taxing authorities, and before governmental and regulatory authorities.
Professionals
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
March 4, 2010
|
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
February 2, 2010
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
January 27, 2010
|
|
|
January 7, 2010
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
December 23, 2009
|
|
|
December 17, 2009
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
|
November 25, 2009
|
|
|
September 28, 2009
|
|
|
September 21, 2009
|
|
|
August 12, 2009
|
|
|
August 5, 2009
|
|
|
July 28, 2009
|
|
|
July 20, 2009
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
June 12, 2009
|
|
|
June 10, 2009
|
|
|
May 12, 2009
|
|
|
February/March 2009
|
|
|
March 20, 2009
|
|
|
March 18, 2009
|
|
|
March 11, 2009
|
|
|
March 9, 2009
|
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 17, 2008
|
|
|
December 9, 2008
|
|
|
December 5, 2008
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
Fall 2008
|
|
|
November 4, 2008
|
|
|
October 6, 2008
|
|
|
September 23, 2008
|
|
|
July 10, 2008
|
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
June 23, 2008
|
|
|
April 16, 2008
|
|
|
March 24, 2008
|
|
|
February 2008
|
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
November 13, 2007
|
|
|
October 31, 2007
|
|
|
September 27, 2007
|
|
|
September 5, 2007
|
|
|
June 15, 2007
|
|
|
April 4, 2007
|
|
|
April 2, 2007
|
|
|
June 23, 2010
|
Presented by TexasBarCLE
San Antonio, Texas
|
|
May 20, 2010
|
Presented by Queens University of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
|
May 13, 2010
|
Presented by Citywealth Magazine
London, United Kingdom
|
|
May 06, 2010
|
Presented by the American Bar Association
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
|
May 05, 2010
|
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of New York City
New York, New York
|
|
May 05, 2010
|
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of Lower Fairfield County
Old Greenwich, Connecticut
|
|
April 28, 2010
|
Presented by the Hudson Valley Estate Planning Council
Milton, New York
|
|
April 21, 2010
|
Presented by Cambridge International Forums
Vevey, Switzerland
|
|
March 15, 2010
|
Presented by St. John's University School of Law
New York, New York
|
|
March 03, 2010
|
Presented by the New York Society of Security Analysts
New York, New York
|
|
February 25, 2010
|
Presented by Legal Week
Provence, France
|
|
February 22, 2010
|
Presented by The Knowledge Group LLC
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
Presented by Continuing Education of the Bar - California
Los Angeles, California
|
|
January 25, 2010
|
Presented by the University of Miami School of Law
Orlando, Florida
|
|
January 12, 2010
|
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of Eastern New York
Albany, New York
|
|
December 01, 2009
|
Presented by IIR
London
|
|
November 19, 2009
|
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
New York, New York
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
Presented by Legal Week
Lake Como
|
|
November 04, 2009
|
Presented by the Maryland Association of CPA's
Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
November 03, 2009
|
Presented by the Knowledge Group
|
|
October 29, 2009
|
Presented by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP and Rothstein Kass
New York, New York
|
|
October 28, 2009
|
Presented by the Tulane Law School
New Orleans, Louisiana
|
|
October 13, 2009
|
Presented by the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners
London
|
|
October 13, 2009
|
Presented by IBC Global Conferences
London
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
Presented by the ABA Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law, and the ABA Section of Taxation
Chicago, Illinois
|
|
September 14, 2009
|
Presented by the Practising Law Institute
New York
|
|
July 14, 2009
|
Presented by the New York Society of CPAs
New York
|
|
July 08, 2009
|
Presented by The Knowledge Congress
|
|
June 14, 2009
|
Presented by the American Law Institute, American Bar Association and Continuing Legal Education for Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
|
|
June 09, 2009
|
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
New York
|
|
June 08, 2009
|
Presented by the Institute for International Research
Chicago
|
|
May 20, 2009
|
New York
New York, New York
|
|
May 20, 2009
|
Presented by Cambridge International Forums
Barcelona
|
|
May 14, 2009
|
Presented by Hudson Valley Bank
New York
|
|
May 14, 2009
|
Presented by Citywealth Magazine
London,
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
Amelia Island, Florida
|
-
$40,000,000 worth of copyright interests of a renowned composer were owned by two trusts for the benefit of multiple generations of his family, only one of which trusts was exempt from generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes.
Following the death of the composer's children, the efficient management of the copyrights would be lost because the trustees of the non-exempt trust are required to make outright distributions of a portion of the trust's assets (including the copyright interests) to the composer's many grandchildren. What is worse, the non-exempt trust would be subject to millions of dollars in GST tax, which would require the sale of its share of the copyright interests. Our attorneys developed and implemented a plan whereby the non-exempt trust sold its share of the copyright interests to the exempt trust. As a result, the non-exempt trust will be spent down and used to support the composer's children and the exempt trust will keep control of the copyrights, which will be preserved for future generations of the composer's family without the imposition of the onerous GST taxes.
-
Days before she died of terminal cancer, a wife tried to trigger her husband's obligation to pay her $20 million under a post nuptial agreement by asserting that she intended to divorce him.
After the wife's death, the husband refused to pay this claim. On behalf of the wife's executor, our attorneys negotiated a settlement of $16 million with the husband. The IRS nevertheless valued the wife's claim at the full face amount of $20 million for estate tax purposes. Pointing to the risks involved in the protracted litigation with the husband, our attorneys successfully argued that the claim had a fair market value of $2 million, thereby saving the wife's estate $9 million in estate taxes.
-
In a Will signed more than 25 years ago, a generous philanthropist left the bulk of her estate to a university.
She directed that the university use the funds to provide annual scholarships of up to $3,000 to needy students. Because of the significant increase over the years in both the scholarship fund and the annual costs of education, this $3,000 restriction was no longer practical. At the university's request, our attorneys successfully petitioned the Court to lift the restriction in the Will to provide annual scholarships that cover the actual annual costs of education, thereby honoring the decedent's charitable intentions.
-
Members of a family with multi-jurisdictional European contacts consulted us with respect to planning for their ultimate exposure to worldwide U.S. income and transfer taxation upon their impending emigration to the U.S.
The family members are beneficiaries of certain foreign non-grantor trusts, which own offshore corporations which in turn own interests in European operating businesses. In particular, the family members were concerned that they could be subject to onerous U.S. income tax, interest and penalties as a result of the trusts' indirect interests in certain U.K. businesses and on distributions to them from the trusts. Our attorneys created an innovative two-tier trust structure for the family so that property which is distributed from the family’s original trusts to those members of the family who are U.S. persons will be free from any U.S. income tax whatsoever, while their business interests and most personal assets will remain exempt from U.S. transfer taxation.
-
Pre-IPO Planning - A multi-national family seeking to transfer wealth to the second generation while retaining full control of a closely-held U.S. company in contemplation of a future IPO engaged us to advise them.
Our attorneys restructured the ownership of the company and then created a series of trusts to hold the voting and nonvoting shares of the company for the benefit of the entire family. Subsequently, when IPO talks in fact materialized, we worked closely with investment bankers throughout the process further to facilitate the intergenerational planning, conducting sophisticated corporate restructuring to the benefit of both the family and the company. Throughout the process, our clients were able to continue to manage and benefit from the company, while moving vastly appreciated assets to the second generation transfer tax-free.
-
The remainder beneficiaries of various family trusts sued the trustee, asserting that the trusts generated too much income for their mother, thereby giving up growth of principal.
The trustee asserted that it had invested the trust assets appropriately to meet the mother's needs. Our attorneys successfully negotiated a settlement whereby the mother satisfied her children's claims directly. As a result, the mother's estate planning goals were met transfer tax-free and the trustee obtained full releases for its actions and remained as trustee.
|
|