Contact

  • Practice Chair
    p / 212.940.7150

Trusts and Estates

Our attorneys provide the full panoply of trusts and estates related services on a local, national and international level.  We perform sophisticated estate, tax, business, charitable and personal planning for high net worth individuals, entrepreneurs and others with complex assets or affairs.  We represent both fiduciaries and beneficiaries in connection with ongoing estate and trust administration on a multigenerational basis.  We are also experienced in handling contested proceedings involving estates and trusts in the courts, before taxing authorities, and before governmental and regulatory authorities.

Professionals

Chicago
Associate
New York
Counsel
Chicago
Partner
Chicago
Partner
Charlotte
Associate
New York
Counsel
New York
Partner
New York
Associate
New York
Partner
New York
Associate
Chicago
Associate
Los Angeles
Associate
Chicago
Associate
Los Angeles
Partner
New York
Counsel
New York
Counsel
New York
Associate
Chicago
Associate
New York
Associate
New York
Associate
Chicago
Associate
Chicago
Partner
New York
Partner
Chicago
Partner
Chicago
Partner
Los Angeles
Partner
New York
Counsel
Chicago
Senior Counsel
Chicago
Associate
New York
Special Counsel
Chicago
Associate
New York
Partner
Chicago
Of Counsel
New York
Special Counsel
New York
Associate
Chicago
Staff Attorney
New York
Counsel
New York
Co-Managing Partner
New York
Associate
New York
Associate
Chicago
Partner
New York
Partner
Charlotte
Of Counsel
Los Angeles
Associate
New York
Partner
Chicago
Partner
Charlotte
Partner
Los Angeles
Associate
March 4, 2010
February 17, 2010
February 2, 2010
January 2010
January 27, 2010
January 7, 2010
January 2010
December 23, 2009
December 17, 2009
December 2009
November 25, 2009
September 28, 2009
September 21, 2009
August 12, 2009
August 5, 2009
July 28, 2009
July 20, 2009
July 2009
July 2009
June 12, 2009
June 10, 2009
May 12, 2009
February/March 2009
March 20, 2009
March 18, 2009
March 11, 2009
March 9, 2009
February 26, 2009
2008
December 17, 2008
December 9, 2008
December 5, 2008
December 2008
Fall 2008
November 4, 2008
October 6, 2008
September 23, 2008
July 10, 2008
June 2008
June 23, 2008
April 16, 2008
March 24, 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 13, 2007
October 31, 2007
September 27, 2007
September 5, 2007
June 15, 2007
April 4, 2007
April 2, 2007
June 23, 2010
Presented by TexasBarCLE
San Antonio, Texas
May 20, 2010
Presented by Queens University of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina
May 13, 2010
Presented by Citywealth Magazine
London, United Kingdom
May 06, 2010
Presented by the American Bar Association
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 05, 2010
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of New York City
New York, New York
May 05, 2010
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of Lower Fairfield County
Old Greenwich, Connecticut
April 28, 2010
Presented by the Hudson Valley Estate Planning Council
Milton, New York
April 21, 2010
Presented by Cambridge International Forums
Vevey, Switzerland
March 15, 2010
Presented by St. John's University School of Law
New York, New York
March 03, 2010
Presented by the New York Society of Security Analysts
New York, New York
February 25, 2010
Presented by Legal Week
Provence, France
February 22, 2010
Presented by The Knowledge Group LLC
January 29, 2010
Presented by Continuing Education of the Bar - California
Los Angeles, California
January 25, 2010
Presented by the University of Miami School of Law
Orlando, Florida
January 12, 2010
Presented by the Estate Planning Council of Eastern New York
Albany, New York
December 01, 2009
Presented by IIR
London
November 19, 2009
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
New York, New York
November 12, 2009
Presented by Legal Week
Lake Como
November 04, 2009
Presented by the Maryland Association of CPA's
Baltimore, Maryland
November 03, 2009
Presented by the Knowledge Group
October 29, 2009
Presented by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP and Rothstein Kass
New York, New York
October 28, 2009
Presented by the Tulane Law School
New Orleans, Louisiana
October 13, 2009
Presented by the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners
London
October 13, 2009
Presented by IBC Global Conferences
London
September 24, 2009
Presented by the ABA Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law, and the ABA Section of Taxation
Chicago, Illinois
September 14, 2009
Presented by the Practising Law Institute
New York
July 14, 2009
Presented by the New York Society of CPAs
New York
July 08, 2009
Presented by The Knowledge Congress
June 14, 2009
Presented by the American Law Institute, American Bar Association and Continuing Legal Education for Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
June 09, 2009
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
New York
June 08, 2009
Presented by the Institute for International Research
Chicago
May 20, 2009
New York
New York, New York
May 20, 2009
Presented by Cambridge International Forums
Barcelona
May 14, 2009
Presented by Hudson Valley Bank
New York
May 14, 2009
Presented by Citywealth Magazine
London,
March 19, 2009
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
Amelia Island, Florida
Case Studies
  • $40,000,000 worth of copyright interests of a renowned composer were owned by two trusts for the benefit of multiple generations of his family, only one of which trusts was exempt from generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes. Following the death of the composer's children, the efficient management of the copyrights would be lost because the trustees of the non-exempt trust are required to make outright distributions of a portion of the trust's assets (including the copyright interests) to the composer's many grandchildren.  What is worse, the non-exempt trust would be subject to millions of dollars in GST tax, which would require the sale of its share of the copyright interests.  Our attorneys developed and implemented a plan whereby the non-exempt trust sold its share of the copyright interests to the exempt trust.  As a result, the non-exempt trust will be spent down and used to support the composer's children and the exempt trust will keep control of the copyrights, which will be preserved for future generations of the composer's family without the imposition of the onerous GST taxes.
  • Days before she died of terminal cancer, a wife tried to trigger her husband's obligation to pay her $20 million under a post nuptial agreement by asserting that she intended to divorce him. After the wife's death, the husband refused to pay this claim.  On behalf of the wife's executor, our attorneys negotiated a settlement of $16 million with the husband.  The IRS nevertheless valued the wife's claim at the full face amount of $20 million for estate tax purposes.  Pointing to the risks involved in the protracted litigation with the husband, our attorneys successfully argued that the claim had a fair market value of $2 million, thereby saving the wife's estate $9 million in estate taxes.
  • In a Will signed more than 25 years ago, a generous philanthropist left the bulk of her estate to a university. She directed that the university use the funds to provide annual scholarships of up to $3,000 to needy students.  Because of the significant increase over the years in both the scholarship fund and the annual costs of education, this $3,000 restriction was no longer practical.  At the university's request, our attorneys successfully petitioned the Court to lift the restriction in the Will to provide annual scholarships that cover the actual annual costs of education, thereby honoring the decedent's charitable intentions.
  • Members of a family with multi-jurisdictional European contacts consulted us with respect to planning for their ultimate exposure to worldwide U.S. income and transfer taxation upon their impending emigration to the U.S. The family members are beneficiaries of certain foreign non-grantor trusts, which own offshore corporations which in turn own interests in European operating businesses. In particular, the family members were concerned that they could be subject to onerous U.S. income tax, interest and penalties as a result of the trusts' indirect interests in certain U.K. businesses and on distributions to them from the trusts. Our attorneys created an innovative two-tier trust structure for the family so that property which is distributed from the family’s original trusts to those members of the family who are U.S. persons will be free from any U.S. income tax whatsoever, while their business interests and most personal assets will remain exempt from U.S. transfer taxation.
  • Pre-IPO Planning - A multi-national family seeking to transfer wealth to the second generation while retaining full control of a closely-held U.S. company in contemplation of a future IPO engaged us to advise them. Our attorneys restructured the ownership of the company and then created a series of trusts to hold the voting and nonvoting shares of the company for the benefit of the entire family. Subsequently, when IPO talks in fact materialized, we worked closely with investment bankers throughout the process further to facilitate the intergenerational planning, conducting sophisticated corporate restructuring to the benefit of both the family and the company. Throughout the process, our clients were able to continue to manage and benefit from the company, while moving vastly appreciated assets to the second generation transfer tax-free.
  • The remainder beneficiaries of various family trusts sued the trustee, asserting that the trusts generated too much income for their mother, thereby giving up growth of principal. The trustee asserted that it had invested the trust assets appropriately to meet the mother's needs.  Our attorneys successfully negotiated a settlement whereby the mother satisfied her children's claims directly.  As a result, the mother's estate planning goals were met transfer tax-free and the trustee obtained full releases for its actions and remained as trustee.

Related Practices