|
|
Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
Our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice provides comprehensive services in planning, designing and implementing employee benefits and executive compensation programs for organizations of all sizes and structures. Combined, our attorneys have more than 200 years of benefits experience including at the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
One of the most important components of our Practice’s overall philosophy is our ability to resolve legal issues that do not have well-defined answers in an efficient and pragmatic manner. We are leaders in a changing industry, and our focus is on creative, practical solutions to problems.
Our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice provides comprehensive services in planning, designing and implementing employee benefits and executive compensation programs for organizations of all sizes and structures. Combined, our attorneys have more than 200 years of benefits experience including at the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
One of the most important components of our Practice’s overall philosophy is our ability to resolve legal issues that do not have well-defined answers in an efficient and pragmatic manner. We are leaders in a changing industry, and our focus is on creative, practical solutions to problems.
Qualified Plans
Our attorneys provide counseling regarding design, implementation and administration of tax-qualified plans including 401(k), money purchase, profit sharing, ESOP and cash balance plans.
Welfare Plans
We are recognized leaders in the design and administration of welfare plans and trusts and the negotiation of agreements with service providers. We understand the employer liability issues associated with managed care and retiree medical obligations as well as the means that employers can use to avoid or limit such liability. We regularly counsel employers on COBRA, HIPAA, Medicare Part D and the termination of retiree medical plans.
Executive Compensation
For clients ranging from privately held companies to large publicly held companies, we plan, negotiate and prepare multiple compensatory arrangements between employers and their key employees, including employment contracts, restrictive covenants (such as non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disclosure provisions), change in control agreements, incentive compensation and bonus programs, compensation deferral arrangements, funding mechanisms, stock option plans and grant agreements, restricted stock plans and award agreements and other equity-based compensation arrangements.
Fiduciary/Investment Management
We represent both plan fiduciaries who are purchasing investment services and financial institutions in the structuring and offering of investment products in the retirement plan market, including ERISA plan governance reviews, negotiation of investment management agreements, trust agreements, commingled investment funds and in stable value, real estate, private equity, derivatives, alternatives and other investment products.
ERISA Litigation
Combining the skills of seasoned litigators with the hands-on knowledge of lawyers who regularly counsel plan sponsors and fiduciaries on the impact of the developing case law, Katten offers experienced representation in ERISA litigation. Attorneys from our Litigation and Employee Benefits practices work together to represent clients in federal district court, the United States Tax Court, arbitrations and mediations, and pre-litigation negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor. As a result of the frequent overlap between ERISA and other substantive areas of the law, we are able to apply the Firm’s experience in employment, tax, health care, insurance and securities litigation in a cost-effective litigation strategy focused on successful outcomes. Our attorneys also have acted as expert witnesses in several ERISA cases.
Professionals
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
January 28, 2010
|
|
|
January 7, 2010
|
|
|
December 22, 2009
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
|
September 23, 2009
|
|
|
September 21, 2009
|
|
|
August 12, 2009
|
|
|
August 5, 2009
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
July 13, 2009
|
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
|
July 7, 2009
|
|
|
June 19, 2009
|
|
|
June 11, 2009
|
|
|
May 27, 2009
|
|
|
May 20, 2009
|
|
|
May 8, 2009
|
|
|
May 4, 2009
|
|
|
April 23, 2009
|
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
|
|
March 26, 2009
|
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
|
|
March 18, 2009
|
|
|
March 12, 2009
|
|
|
March 11, 2009
|
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
February 26, 2009
|
|
|
February 20, 2009
|
|
|
February 18, 2009
|
|
|
February 12, 2009
|
|
|
February 10, 2009
|
|
|
January 27, 2009
|
|
|
January 26, 2009
|
|
|
January 16, 2009
|
|
|
December 23, 2008
|
|
|
December 1, 2008
|
|
|
November 25, 2008
|
|
|
November 18, 2008
|
|
|
November 17, 2008
|
|
|
November 13, 2008
|
|
|
November 12, 2008
|
|
|
Autumn 2008
|
|
|
October 15, 2008
|
|
|
October 13, 2008
|
|
|
October 13, 2008
|
|
|
October 6, 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
September 29, 2008
|
|
|
September 1, 2008
|
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
June 12, 2008
|
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
March 24, 2008
|
|
|
February 2008
|
|
|
October 31, 2007
|
|
|
August 6, 2007
|
|
|
June 15, 2007
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
|
April 20, 2007
|
|
|
May 19, 2010
|
Presented by the American Bar Association
Chicago, Illinois
|
|
April 13, 2010
|
Presented by the Practising Law Institute
New York, New York
|
|
October 22, 2009
|
Presented by the New York Metro Area Chapter of the International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
New York, New York
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
Presented by the ESOP Association
Bloomington, Minnesota
|
|
September 17, 2009
|
Presented by the New York State Bar Association
New York
|
|
August 27, 2009
|
Presented by Baker Tilly
Chicago
|
|
August 04, 2009
|
Presented by The Knowledge Congress
|
|
June 25, 2009
|
Presented by the World Research Group
Las Vegas
|
|
June 04, 2009
|
Presented by West Legalworks
New York
|
|
May 14, 2009
|
Presented by ISCEBS New York Metro Area Chapter
New York
|
|
April 21, 2009
|
Presented by the National Center for Employee Ownership and the Beyster Institute
Portland
|
|
March 24, 2009
|
Presented by the Profit Sharing/401k Council of America
Chicago
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
Chicago
|
-
Assisted a multinational publicly held company in implementing a cross-border stock option plan and achieving compliance with local laws while ensuring maximum tax efficiency at a corporate and individual level.
-
Assisted client in connection with its initial public offering including advising on issues relating to executive compensation and benefits in general, specifically the adoption of employee stock purchase plans,
preparing for compliance with additional tax requirements, such as Section 162(m), or stock exchange rules.
-
Assisted Fortune 25 employer in the redesign, amendment, funding and operation of its welfare benefit trust (VEBA) for the purpose of prefunding a portion of its postretirement medical benefit obligation.
-
Combined tax and ERISA experience to arrange for the financing by a large, Midwest employer of several hundred million dollars in unfunded retiree medical and life insurance liabilities through a creative investment vehicle in a
manner which generated tax savings and financial planning while avoiding unrelated business income tax.
-
Counseled Fortune 500 industrial company on pension issues including (a) early retirement windows and coordination of window benefits with severance benefits in a reduction of force; (b) merging plans in an acquisition or
for financial reporting purposes; and (c) where possible, correcting plan disqualification events under the EPCRS.
-
Counseled major food products company in connection with all aspects of its welfare benefit plans including plan governance matters, negotiating outsourcing contracts with vendors to the plan for every type of service,
and compliance issues ranging from ERISA to HIPAA and Medicare.
-
Health Reimbursement Accounts
In 2002 the State of Montana enacted a statute whereby state agencies would be able to pay terminating/retiring employees a portion of their untaken leave time in the form of contributions to a medical benefit account (with which to reimburse future medical expenses/premiums) rather than cash. We were retained by the State and assisted in the successful design, documentation, implementation and IRS approval of a funded HRA (health reimbursement account) which saved the State employment tax and the employees income tax and employment tax.
-
Retiree Welfare Benefit Plans
An employer with several hundred million dollars in postretirement medical and life insurance benefit obligations retained Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP to assist it in addressing the many financial, investment and tax issues attendant to its retiree welfare benefit plans. We assisted the company in the restructure of its benefit plans, the documentation, implementation and qualification of a VEBA which satisfied the unfunded FASB 106 obligation, resulting in an investment vehicle which generated very substantial investment gains, and creatively avoiding the potential Unrelated Business Income Tax.
-
Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association
School districts in a Midwestern state were faced with large, unfunded postretirement medical liabilities. The legislature facilitated the funding of those liabilities through the issuance of bonds earmarked for the payment of those liabilities. We were retained and assisted in the design, documentation and IRS approval of a VEBA which was established to fund those retiree medical obligations, as well as ongoing additional employee medical expenses of active employees of the school districts.
|
|