|
|
Customs and International Trade
The Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Customs and International Trade Practice is a national leader in understanding the constantly changing world of international trade. Our group has the credentials, experience and track record that has enabled our clients to exploit the opportunities and avoid the pitfalls present in the global marketplace. We provide effective, cost-conscious legal advice on the full array of regulatory, dispute resolution, policy and corporate compliance matters that ensure our clients’ success.
The Firms’s Global Trade Advisory Group (“GTAG”) complements our group of attorneys and provides deep bench strength that delivers benefits to our clients. A division of the Firm’s Customs and International Trade practice, GTAG blends our attorneys with a broad array of trade and audit specialists and logistics professionals, to provide our clients with expert advice on wide-ranging aspects of international trade. Our multi-disciplinary approach ensures that our clients have all the information they need – from legal advice to business resources – to make the right decisions to succeed in the international market.
The Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Customs and International Trade Practice is a national leader in understanding the constantly changing world of international trade. Our group has the credentials, experience and track record that has enabled our clients to exploit the opportunities and avoid the pitfalls present in the global marketplace. We provide effective, cost-conscious legal advice on the full array of regulatory, dispute resolution, policy and corporate compliance matters that ensure our clients’ success.
The Firm's Global Trade Advisory Group (“GTAG”) complements our group of attorneys and provides deep bench strength that delivers benefits to our clients. A division of the Firm’s Customs and International Trade practice, GTAG blends our attorneys with a broad array of trade and audit specialists and logistics professionals, to provide our clients with expert advice on wide-ranging aspects of international trade. Our multi-disciplinary approach ensures that our clients have all the information they need – from legal advice to business resources – to make the right decisions to succeed in the international market.Trade Compliance
U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other federal agencies are stepping up their efforts to ensure that all goods, either imported into or exported from the United States, are in compliance with all U.S. rules and regulations. The Firm focuses on helping companies design business processes and procedures that meet their policy and operational objectives and that can be easily integrated into their business practices. With proper planning, potentially adverse customs and international trade risks can be minimized. We assist companies in numerous compliance areas including Focused Assessments, Enforcement Matters, C-TPAT, and Prior Disclosures as well as others.
Global Compliance/Distribution/Supply Chain
The Firm recognizes that in today’s competitive global economy, it is imperative for companies to make informed sourcing decisions. We advise clients on how to maximize duty-saving opportunities under existing preferential trade agreements and special duty programs. In addition, the Firm counsels clients on how to cope with non-tariff trade barriers in foreign countries and lobbies for removal of trade barriers.
Cargo Security and Supply Chain Management
In the spring of 2002, U.S. Customs and Border Protection launched the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), a joint government-business initiative to strengthen importers’ supply chains and increase border security against terrorist activities. Using the tools in the The Firm C-TPAT Solutions Kit, the Firm’s attorneys help clients successfully navigate the C-TPAT application process. After membership is achieved, the Firm continues to assist its clients with their on-going C-TPAT compliance obligations in order to maximize the benefits available under the program.
Import Counseling
Over the past decade, the statutes and regulations governing the importation of merchandise have increased in complexity, requiring importers to keep abreast of developments. The Firm not only assists clients in navigating the myriad of customs and international trade laws governing the importation of goods but also works with them to discover opportunities created by various trade agreements, duty preference programs and customs procedures to maximize a company’s legal compliance while minimizing exposure to duties, investigations and penalties.
Trade Remedies
Surges in imports, antidumping/countervailing duties, merchandise exclusion orders and other trade measures present potentially devastating consequences for importers and exports. The Firm attorneys advocate client interests in the trade remedies arena before numerous government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements, the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Trade Litigation
Whether as a last resort or as a preemptive measure to prevent immediate injury to our clients, litigation can be an important component to an overall trade strategy. The Firm provides a wide range of trade litigation services, ranging from traditional customs litigation to lawsuits against other private parties. Victories in Travenol, Inc. v. United States and Stone Container Corp. v. United States have resulted in duty and tax refunds of hundreds of millions of dollars, not just for the Firm’s clients, but for thousands of importers and exporters nationwide.
Business/Corporate Transactions
Many clients ask us to advise them regarding potential regulatory issues raised by prospective corporate transactions and business arrangements. The Firm's attorneys are highly skilled at drafting documents and providing advice on potential regulatory issues that arise in the course of international business transactions.
Export Management
The Firm assists its clients with expanding their export markets, managing their regulatory burdens and risks, and meeting government compliance obligations. We help by assessing unseen risks in the complex rules on exporting physical commodities and the subtle controls on sharing technology and software with foreign nationals. We also work with our clients to identify opportunities under regulatory exceptions to export licensing requirements.
Training, Seminars and Information Services
The Firm realizes that companies require knowledgeable personnel to comply with the Customs Modernization Act’s requirements. Importers must exercise reasonable care when they enter, classify and value imported merchandise. In addition, recent changes in the export regulations impose greater responsibilities on parties engaging in export transactions. The Firm has designed training seminars to match the experience level and budget of any business organization to assist companies in educating and informing in-house personnel responsible for compliance with these laws.
Professionals
Other Professionals
|
Contract Customs and Trade Auditor
|
|
July 21, 2010
|
|
|
June 10, 2010
|
|
|
May 27, 2010
|
|
|
April 1, 2010
|
|
|
March 4, 2010
|
|
|
December 23, 2009
|
|
|
October 22, 2009
|
|
|
September 21, 2009
|
|
|
August 27, 2009
|
|
|
August 12, 2009
|
|
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
|
July 16, 2009
|
|
|
June 10, 2009
|
|
|
March 23, 2009
|
|
|
November 25, 2008
|
|
|
October 13, 2008
|
|
|
October 6, 2008
|
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
January 2008
|
|
|
January 2008
|
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
|
July 12, 2007
|
|
|
May 25, 2007
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
April 3, 2007
|
|
|
January 18, 2007
|
|
|
December 12, 2006
|
|
|
November 16, 2006
|
|
|
September 14, 2006
|
|
|
September 1, 2006
|
|
|
July 2006
|
|
|
May 2006
|
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
February 2006
|
|
|
January 2006
|
|
|
October 2005
|
|
|
August 2005
|
|
|
July 2005
|
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
April 2005
|
|
|
April 2005
|
|
|
May 13, 2003
|
|
|
April 2002
|
|
|
January 4, 2002
|
|
|
September 28, 2001
|
|
|
August 21, 2001
|
|
|
August 20, 2001
|
|
|
August 3, 2001
|
|
|
July 23, 2001
|
|
|
June 26, 2001
|
|
|
June 18, 2001
|
|
|
May 9, 2001
|
|
|
April 20, 2001
|
|
|
March 15, 2001
|
|
|
February 1, 2001
|
|
|
December 1, 2000
|
|
|
December 1, 2000
|
|
|
November 1, 2000
|
|
|
October 1, 2000
|
|
 |
|
September 16, 2010
|
Presented by Kutchins, Robbins & Diamond, Ltd.
Schaumburg, Illinois
|
|
November 19, 2009
|
Presented by the U.S.-China Chamber of Commerce
Chicago, Illinois
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
Chicago, Illinois
|
-
C-TPAT
The Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP international trade attorneys assisted a major automotive manufacturer through the application process for membership in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) initiative. Utilizing the firm’s proprietary Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP C-TPAT Solutions Kit, the Firm’s attorneys assisted the client at every stage of the application process, including, most significantly, compilation of the client’s Supply Chain Security Profile. Upon completion of the necessary documentation, the client’s C-TPAT application was submitted to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at which point the application was quickly and unconditionally approved, realizing immediate benefits to the client.
-
Customs Compliance/Import
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP’s Customs Practice attorneys, auditors, and trade specialists recently worked with a major pharmaceutical company to complete an internal review of the company’s import operations and identify potential risks and compliance gaps in its import programs. Once identified, the Firm’s multi-disciplinary team was able to assist the client in implementing the necessary internal controls and compliance tools to enhance and develop the company's import operations and position it for participation in Customs’ Importer Self-Assessment (“ISA”) program, while also identifying significant duty-savings opportunities through the use of duty preference programs and more accurate tariff classifications.
-
During the U.S. embargo of Iraq , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP’s international trade attorneys
successfully secured authorization for a U.S. oilfield equipment manufacturer to enter into executory contracts with foreign parties for the sale of equipment ultimately destined for Iraq under the U.N. Oil-for-Food program. Prior to the Firm’s involvement, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Iraqi Sanctions Regulations (“ISR”) allowed U.S. persons to enter into executory contracts with the Iraqi government to sell oilfield equipment to Iraq under the Oil-for-Food program, although Treasury Department approval was required prior to any contract performance. The potential “roadblock” faced by our client was that the ISR did not expressly authorize U.S. persons to enter into executory contracts with third parties in countries outside Iraq with respect to oilfield equipment sales under the Oil-for-Food program.
To resolve this problem, the Firm argued to the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) that the ISR should be construed to authorize U.S. persons to enter into executory contracts with third country parties for the sale of oilfield equipment destined for Iraq under the U.N. Oil-for-Food program, so long as OFAC authorization was obtained prior to contract performance. Focusing on the regulatory history of the ISR allowance for executory contracts with the Iraqi government and the underlying public policy, the Firm demonstrated that this allowance was intended to apply equally to executory contracts with parties in third countries. In response, OFAC issued an interpretive ruling to the Firm adopting our position and confirming our client’s authorization under the ISR to enter into executory contracts with third country parties for the sale and export of oilfield equipment to Iraq under the U.N. Oil-for-Food program.
-
Trade Remedies
Recently, the Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Customs and International Trade Practice successfully represented a major U.S. office supply company in an antidumping case. In the case of Hand Trucks and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, our client, which was purchasing hand trucks from unrelated Chinese manufacturers, was forced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to deposit over 400 percent in antidumping duties on its imported hand trucks, although neither it nor its Chinese supplier were named as parties to the antidumping complaint filed by the U.S. hand truck industry.
|
|